There are people arguing on why the China market will not have a Lehman moment, thanks to their strong reserves and strict government control. Here is an interesting article sharing why all these will not matter, should there be a Lehman moment in China. Interesting read
~ Xeo
To contact the writer of this article: William Pesek at wpesek@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this article: Nisid Hajari at nhajari@bloomberg.net
~ Xeo
![]() |
| ChinaFotoPress via Getty Images |
China's infamous "ghost cities" are even scarier than they sound.
As
home prices across China have fallen 10.2 percent in the first five
months of this year, property developers are showing signs of panic. Now
they seem to be drawing their inspiration from Angelo Mozilo.
Like the former head of Countrywide Financial Corp., they're doing
their worst to evade regulations meant to tamp down on property
speculation, and have even started offering no-money-down loans to
China's 1.3 billion property-obsessed citizens. When you consider how
badly such schemes ended for Countrywide, and ultimately the U.S.
economy, you begin to understand why this is such a chilling
development.
More and more economists are warning that China could
be approaching a "Minsky moment." That's when a speculative boom comes
to a sudden and nasty end as debt accumulation outpaces cash flow. In
truth, no one really knows how bad the situation in China might be right
now given how rapidly the country's vast and opaque shadow-banking
system has grown.
When China bulls explain why the world
shouldn’t worry about mainland finances, they often cite the requirement
for a 30 percent down-payment on real estate. But as Bloomberg News reported
on June 13, deals skirting those conventions are starting to appear
from Guangzhou and Shenzhen in the south to Beijing in the north. This
is adding to risks for property companies, lenders and an economy
already heading for the weakest growth in 24 years.
A failure to regulate America's non-depository banking system is what undid the world's biggest economy in 2008. China's own shadow-banking
monster is estimated at $7 trillion and encompasses many
non-transparent financing vehicles that developers or third parties use
to arrange funding to cover down-payment requirements. The overwhelming
odds are that this dodgy sector is much bigger than anyone knows,
including Xi's economic-restructuring team. It could be significantly
larger than China's $8.2 trillion economy.
In a world
obsessing about too-big-to-fail banks, China's entire economy could be
too big to save. Well, bulls say, what about those $4 trillion of
currency reserves? China would be hard-pressed to deploy those funds for
bailout after bailout, each of which would dwarf the $85 billion lifeline
the U.S. threw at American International Group Inc. The moment traders
got wind of the fire sale in Beijing, markets would crash and U.S.
yields would skyrocket. China would suffer an unimaginable paper loss --
and a more tangible one for its export-reliant economy.
To its
credit, the government is warning consumers to beware of
too-good-to-be-true housing pitches. But the clampdown is cosmetic at
best. As long as the real focus in Beijing is
on meeting the official 7.5 percent annual growth target, the odds that
authorities will choke off all these financing shenanigans are slim.
Subprime lending has become both a way to fuel economic activity and to
convince Chinese families that their wealth is rising enough not to
challenge the Communist Party. It's delaying an economic, and possibly a
political reckoning.
This kind of willful blindness means China's
eventual crash could be even bigger and more spectacular than it might
be otherwise. Those who insist that Xi is doing his best to control the
situation are ignoring official data, which show new yuan loans exceeded
forecasts at $140 billion in May (and "official" means the true figure
is certainly higher).
The reason China's balance sheet is such a
risk to Washington, Tokyo and beyond is that we just don't know how bad
it is. Murky reporting infects all sectors of the economy. At the huge
port in the northeastern city of Qingdao, traders were
recently accused of using the same aluminum and copper stockpiles as
collateral for multiple loans. Instead of adjusting to international
norms of transparency and accounting, China is becoming even more of a
black box as Xi clamps down on the foreign media.
In April, former
Finance Minister Xiang Huaicheng let slip that local governments may
have accumulated more than $3.2 trillion of debt, almost double the
figure given in a 2011 report by the National Audit Office. In Hong
Kong, where it's harder to censor financial information, regulators are
scrambling to impose strict controls on mainland borrowing.
If the
world learned anything from Wall Street's near-death experience, it's
how fast risky actions in one sector spill over into others. The U.S.
mortgage-frenzy quickly devolved into farcical offerings like "no-doc"
loans with dodgy documentation requirements and "interest-only"
contracts with no initial principal payments. As China makes the same
mistakes, Xi may find China headed for a hard landing -- and quite
suddenly so.
To contact the editor responsible for this article: Nisid Hajari at nhajari@bloomberg.net

No comments:
Post a Comment